The impact of psycholinguistics in discriminating between fake news spreaders and fact checkers

Fake news is a threat to society. A huge amount of fake news is posted every day on social networks which is read, believed and sometimes shared by a number of users. On the other hand, with the aim to raise awareness, some users share posts that debunk fake news by using information from fact-checking websites. In this paper, we are interested in exploring the role of various psycholinguistic characteristics in differentiating between users that tend to share fake news and users that tend to debunk them. Psycholinguistic characteristics represent the different linguistic information that can be used to profile users and can be extracted or inferred from users’ posts. We present the CheckerOrSpreader model that uses a Convolution Neural Network (CNN) to differentiate between spreaders and checkers of fake news. The experimental results showed that CheckerOrSpreader is effective in classifying a user as a potential spreader or checker. Our analysis showed that checkers tend to use more positive language and a higher number of terms that show causality compared to spreaders who tend to use a higher amount of informal language, including slang and swear words.

In the Receptiviti LIWC Research Series, we highlight important research conducted using our platform and science that has implications for our customers' and partners' businesses and for society at large:

Read the article


Giachanou, Anastasia & Ghanem, Bilal & Ríssola, Esteban & Rosso, Paolo & Crestani, Fabio & Oberski, Daniel. (2021). The impact of psycholinguistic patterns in discriminating between fake news spreaders and fact checkers. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 138. 101960. 10.1016/j.datak.2021.101960.